<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FIRST LOOK: Vortex Razor 22-48x65mm Spotting Scope	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://montana-wild.com/vortex22-48x65-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://montana-wild.com/vortex22-48x65-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vortex22-48x65-review</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 05:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad Carter		</title>
		<link>https://montana-wild.com/vortex22-48x65-review/#comment-17290</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Carter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://montana-wild.com/?p=1256968#comment-17290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve heard a few reviews where they thought glass was better, and a few that said it was the same. Thanks for the review. It&#039;s too bad it weighs so much more than the old version. Not sure I want to upgrade given the weight difference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard a few reviews where they thought glass was better, and a few that said it was the same. Thanks for the review. It&#8217;s too bad it weighs so much more than the old version. Not sure I want to upgrade given the weight difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
